|
Reusables Cost Comparison Tool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This model compares basic cost differences of one way corrugated
packaging and reusable plastic packaging. The model uses basic assumptions
and requires you to input various cost components. While the model uses
factual inputs from prospective users it is intended to offer guidance and
not an absolute indication of exact cost benefits. More specific models are
available to determine specific cost benefits once an overall feel for
expected costs are understood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrugated
|
|
|
Reusable Handheld Container
|
|
|
Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
* average values, your cost will vary
|
|
|
Enter
your actual cost for a corrugated carton, and the cost of a comparably sized
reusable container. Default values are provided.
|
Corrugated
carton
|
|
|
|
Container price
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the cost of tape or other materials used to seal each
carton.
|
Tape per carton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dwell Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Dwell time" is the amount of time in days that a
reusable packaging container will be held at various stages in your supply or
distribution chain. In addition to time at your facility, be sure to also
enter time at any distribution centers, transit time, time at the
destination, and time for preparing and returning the container for reuse.
All times are in full days. (Leave lines blank for rows that do not apply to
your situation).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Containers in use, waiting to be used, or waiting to be shipped
|
|
|
At your site
|
|
|
|
|
"Safety Stock" is an amount of excess packaging kept
on hand to avoid running out at any time. If the cycle time through your
supply chain is relatively predictable, your required "safety
stock" might not be very significant. Experts recommend at least 1
to 3 days.
|
|
|
Safety
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transit days to
1st location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Center, for example.
|
|
|
Days
at 1st Location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transit days to
2nd Location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Distribution Center, or warehouse, if applicable.
|
|
|
Days
at 2nd Location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transit to final
Location
|
|
|
|
|
Final destination (e.g., retail store, warehouse). Includes
containers in use, waiting to be emptied, queued for return.
|
|
|
Days
at Final Location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transit back to
starting point
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing time
for RPC, cleaning etc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dwell Time
|
|
|
|
|
The # of complete round-trips. As dwell time decreases, the # of
round trips per year increases, resulting in better payback potential.
|
|
|
Turns per year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
this example, the annual number of corrugated boxes shipped in a given year,
equals the number of individual reusable containers shipped.
|
Total number of
cartons shipped per year
|
|
|
|
Total number of
RPC containers shipped per year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returnable
Container Cost Per Use
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter your needed internal rate of return here.This may reflect
your return on investment goal, or payback target.
|
|
|
Annual
interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
Containers can last indefinitely if not lost or mishandled, but
it is typical to amortize the cost over a 5 year period.
|
|
|
Amortization years
|
5
|
|
|
|
This is the total quantity of containers needed in your system,
based on the number of containers shipped per year and the number of turns
per year.
|
|
|
Total
reusable fleet size
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simple interest,
Annual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual, principal
|
|
|
|
|
Total annual cost factoring in your internal
rate of return.
|
|
|
Total Annual Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost per trip
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return
Logistics (Costs to Return Containers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the number of miles the empty containers will travel to
return to your facility for additional use
|
|
|
Number
of miles to return empty RPC to the starting point
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost per mile used
|
$1.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum truck load
|
600
|
|
|
|
A
typical truck load can hold 4000 RPCs
|
|
|
|
RPC per truck load
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost per truck load
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return cost per RPC
|
|
|
|
|
Override: If you'd like to
enter your own cost for returning the containers and override these
calculations, select Yes and enter the cost.
|
|
|
|
Enter your own
override reverse logistics cost here (and select yes on left):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation will use this
reverse logitics cost per container
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost per container
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replacement Rate:At what rate do you expect to replace lost or damaged
containers annually? The Default value is 3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost per container
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing Cost:Use
the default value of $0.15 to clean and prepare returned containers for
reuse, or estimate your own.
|
|
|
Processing Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Cost (savings) Estimates
|
|
|
|
Use the optional spaces below to enter additional costs or
savings for corrugated and reusable containers. Examples are provided -
delete or modify as appropriate for your circumstances.
|
|
|
|
Item
|
Calculations - Corrugated
|
Cost per ctn
|
|
Calculations - RPC
|
Cost per container
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional cost (savings)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost per use
|
*This cost comparison
is presented as guidance on evaluating reusables. Each situation will be
unique.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrugated Cost
|
|
|
|
Reusable, total cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
Savings / (Penalty) using Reusable Shipping Container
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost per unit per trip
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Savings / (Penalty)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does
not include potential cost savings from the following benefits of using
Reusables
|
|
|
|
·
Reduced product damage from packaging
|
|
|
|
·
Easier loading and unloading of product; ergonomic benefits
|
|
|
|
·
Better cube utilization in trailers; reusables are made to stack and
interlock
|
|
|
|
·
Reduced tangential packaging costs, (e.g., stretch wrap, corner boards)
|
|
|
|
·
Benefits from reusables creating enabling processes for lean manufacturing
|
|
|
|
·
Potential for reduced greenhouse gas emissions and overall energy consumption
|
|